I think it would be useful to set a rule that the wackyness has to be standard for the private part. I think it shouldn't count that there is a common abnormality of the penis, no matter how common. So for instance Buffalo having a malformed corkscrew penis would not automatically make it a wacky private part because that isn't the norm.

@JussiVilleHeiskanen yeah fair enough, it makes sense to consider the norm rather than malformations e.g. I'm pretty sure ducks do indeed have a corkscrew penis by default

Let's do some pre poll crunching on this. @TheAllMemeingEye Does having a penis bone count as having wacky private parts? Personally I would consider it odd if it didn't. I mean humans don't have a single bone in their penis, normally.

@JussiVilleHeiskanen while it's true that humans don't have penile bones, it doesn't feel that wacky. All of our closest relative primate species have them. Given that "boner" is a common slang term for erect penis, I wouldn't be too surprised if many women without education mistakenly believe that men do have penile bones in the same way that many men without education mistakenly believe that women pee out of their vaginas. Penile bones don't create the same "wait wtf" reaction in me that stuff like snail love darts or the double spiderussy that led to the market do

@TheAllMemeingEye You have brought me to your point of view, well argued.

@TheAllMemeingEye On reflection, the number of animal species having them is substantive as well.

@TheAllMemeingEye You know your entelegynes.

I will not trade on this market.

Let's flick that ranked switch off.

@Quroe

adding the tag doesn't seem to do it for some reason

@mods Rank toggle boop!