Regardless of evidence. Media that readers take seriously. Not Babylon Bee. Someone we've heard of.
Update 2025-07-24 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator has indicated that an outlet reporting that Trump's name is in the Epstein files is not, by itself, sufficient to resolve this market YES. The accusation must be more specific to being a pedo.
Update 2025-11-14 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator has committed to not changing the market close date (2025-12-31). If no accusation meeting the criteria occurs by this date, the market will resolve NO.
People are also trading
@creator Just confirming, do you commit to not changing the market close date? That is the deadline for a default NO resolution?
I don't think this is quite enough to resolve yes, but it's kind of close?
https://www.wsj.com/politics/justice-department-told-trump-name-in-epstein-files-727a8038?mod=e2tw
@SteveBright I would say no, simply being present is not sufficient. I don't think this is enough to resolve this market to yes, but it is certainly a step in that direction.
@WilliamGunn when the justice system is rigged and would not do anything, it is a moral obligations of journalists to spotlight the problem.