Resolves YES if the first AGI claims it itself is capable of loving another, that being a person, another AI, animals, or abstract concepts such as nature, mathmatics, etc.
Resolves NO if the first AGI cannot compute love.
Resolves N/A if AGI doesn't exist by 2050.
Resolves up to my discression, but as of the beginning of this market, it will require zero-shot prompting (if applicable) and be asked in the initial "starting" state of the AGI. Asking it to RP doesn't count.
Lex Fridman can be the tiebreaker, if needed.
People are also trading
How does this resolve if the first AGI is able to convincingly prove, to the satisfaction of most humans, that love does not actually exist/is incoherent?
@duck_master Is that only after RLHF? Would expect that it outputs what humans are most likely to write, which would include claiming to be capable of love.