Ultimately up to my discretion. Some examples might involve:
Manipulating a market to get paper profits and promote in a way that causes significant controversy
A big battle over a market to determine where it lands at league close time
Incorrect market resolution to manipulate league profits
Any of these must actually stir up controversy to count - ie, someone posting something that qualifies in the comments here but otherwise goes unnoticed would not.
I will not trade in this market.
🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ110 | |
| 2 | Ṁ67 | |
| 3 | Ṁ47 | |
| 4 | Ṁ44 | |
| 5 | Ṁ40 |
People are also trading
Would this market fall into your 2nd example?
https://manifold.markets/MichaelWheatley/will-catnee-still-be-the-1-alltime?r=ZGFnbmF6dHk
@dagnazty Is this leagues related? Seems controversial but I don’t see the connection to leagues as of right now - I could just be missing it.
@MarcusAbramovitch To get a better place in leagues? Legitimately not trying to be pedantic here, just the intent of the market was to be about leagues not any market manipulation happening on the site.
@DanMan314 I believe the trade they are claiming is last minute manipulation was for the user’s league with that M2000 bet probably hoping for that quick resolution.
@dagnazty (any unrealized profits still count when leagues lock, so wouldn't need the resolution so long as no one bet it back)
@Stralor I didn’t even look into the actual trade itself egg on my face their trade impacted this market and possibly other users leagues but not theirs directly.
@MarcusAbramovitch I do not think it was for leagues. Catnee was in Bots league and placed last. However MayMeta and Levi were involved in profit manip with leagues but I don't think it was that controversial
I’m not going to actively seek out controversy, feel free to link here things that qualify.
@SimonGrayson Check out some of Levi's moves, I also tried to manipulate leagues a bit but only making bets I think are profitable on their own :)