Measure is all but guaranteed to show up now

Friends of Sunset Dunes on Instagram: "We filed a lawsuit challenging the legality of Prop G because we believe the petition factually misleads voters in numerous ways. A judge ruled on our lawsuit today, describing the case as a tough, close call. Though he found that the Prop G text includes "overstatements", "hyperbole," and various assertions that are "factually debatable," he did not believe we met the high legal bar required in our case to prove that voters were factually misled. We disagree with his ruling and rationale, and we'll evaluate an appeal when his formal ruling is released. But here's the deal: the future of the coast is now up to voters. Prop G's backers refuse to admit that their measure would close and dismantle the park. We need your help ensuring that San Franciscans know the truth. If they do, the future of Sunset Dunes is safe."

Friends of Sunset Dunes on Instagram: "We filed a lawsuit challenging the legality of Prop G because we believe the petition factually misleads voters in numerous ways. A judge ruled on our lawsuit today, describing the case as a tough, close call. Though he found that the Prop G text includes "overstatements", "hyperbole," and various assertions that are "factually debatable," he did not believe we met the high legal bar required in our case to prove that voters were factually misled. We disagree with his ruling and rationale, and we'll evaluate an appeal when his formal ruling is released. But here's the deal: the future of the coast is now up to voters. Prop G's backers refuse to admit that their measure would close and dismantle the park. We need your help ensuring that San Franciscans know the truth. If they do, the future of Sunset Dunes is safe."

45 likes, 5 comments - sunsetdunespark on August 21, 2026: "We filed a lawsuit challenging the legality of Prop G because we believe the petition factually misleads voters in numerous ways. A judge ruled on our lawsuit today, describing the case as a tough, close call. Though he found that the Prop G text includes "overstatements", "hyperbole," and various assertions that are "factually debatable," he did not believe we met the high legal bar required in our case to prove that voters were factually misled. We disagree with his ruling and rationale, and we'll evaluate an appeal when his formal ruling is released. But here's the deal: the future of the coast is now up to voters. Prop G's backers refuse to admit that their measure would close and dismantle the park. We need your help ensuring that San Franciscans know the truth. If they do, the future of Sunset Dunes is safe.".

Will Prop G LOSE by 20 percentage points or more: /MingweiSamuel/will-the-sf-prop-g-to-reopen-the-gr

Will [almost certainly] be on the ballot as Prop G, regardless of the legal challenge

I have crated a question for whether the measure will pass or not: /MingweiSamuel/will-san-francisco-voters-pass-the

spike? what happened?

@Qubits https://missionlocal.org/2026/07/san-francisco-great-highway-ballot-measure/

@Qubits I guess no one was paying attention to it, it was way too low, messed up my predicle. The chance it doesn’t appear is if the lawsuit against it succeeds, but courts rarely invalidate ballot initiatives even if full of lies

I have no idea, I bought No because people told me nothing ever happens.

boosted! i’m interested in this because it will impact the SF rec & park dept’s work this year to figure out the type of park the community wants there. if it gets on the ballot they'll stop their work in anticipation.

@mikala I talked it over with claude and have some intel for you.

They need the same amount of signatures that they needed to recall the guy who championed the prop in the first place (~10,600 signatures). The recall needed signatures from district 4 voters specifically, while this ballot initiative can collect from any registered SF voter citywide. So the bar is arguably lower this time in terms of the percentage of eligible signers they need to reach.

That said, the recall had white-hot local anger fueling it: people in the Sunset felt Engardio pushed Prop K without enough community input and it was very personal for that neighborhood. Whether they can generate that same energy for a signature drive on a measure that most SF voters already weighed in on (and supported) is the open question. But the organizational infrastructure from the recall campaign is already in place, which is why most observers seem to think they'll get there.

Didn't the deadline on this pass already

@RuthGraceWong there's a nov ballot!