I divested because I no longer believe they will move the clock, but have to note that the closing day is set while there is still a week and a half remaining of january @MartinRandall

@JussiVilleHeiskanen yeah it starts leaking by Jan 21.

Nadie resuelve nada con un 50% y el reloj tampoco se detendrá.

First, let's take a look at who's going to be setting the clock: mostly Democrat-leaning Americans.

The last advance came in 2023, inspired by Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Nominally, there are four domains under consideration: Nuclear Risk, Climate Change, Biological Threats and Disruptive Technologies. Ukraine somehow became both a Climate Change issue ("The geopolitical fissure opened by the invasion of Ukraine has weakened the global will to cooperate while undermining confidence in the durability, or even the feasibility, of broad-based multilateral collaboration") and a Disruptive Technology issue (via disinformation and drones). COVID-19 mostly got Biological Threats to itself but there was of course the possibility that Russia could use biological weapons in Ukraine.

As a Manifold user, you're probably thinking that recent advances in AI warrant a few Disruptive Technology ticks, but remember who's making the decision. Advances in 2023 weren't enough to move the clock in 2024.

But something salient to the setters has occurred: Trump's re-election. Trump's behavior features significantly in the writeups for the 2017, 2018 and 2020 advances, so it seems reasonable that they'll register another protest this year and maybe say something about AI while they do it. 73% sounds about right.

And here's a market to watch for arbs (the time is currently 90 seconds to midnight): https://manifold.markets/AAP/doomsday-clock-set-at-less-than-90

why "If thebulletin doesn't release a statement on the clock's new time by the end of February (PST) then this market will resolve to 50%."?

@MartinRandall we seek answers :)

@3d seems unlikely to occur but I wanted to resolve halfway in that case.

@MartinRandall so this clock can either change (resolved as yes) and don't change. is it necessary to add this 3rd scenario, where it does not change, and it is resolved at 50% ? whats the point in offering a yes/no question, when there are three possible outcomes?

@3d yes/no markets are simpler. You're welcome to create another market that better captures what you care about.

I agree, that scenario just seems like a "NO"

@marvingardens well the market is sweepified now so I'm not changing it...

Arb

It would be 80 seconds to midnight by 2025

@NickAllenc961 Wanna bet?

@Shump yep

@NickAllenc961 There you go