Will a mainstream media outlet (NYT, WaPo, The Guardian, WSJ...) publish a story linking AI-generated art to porn?
Besides some Hacker News discussions, I don't see many people discussing the issues of AI-generated porn, particularly deep fakes. All the debate centers around the intellectual rights of the arts.
This market will solve to YES if a mainstream media out runs a story with significant importance (e.g: Not only the NYT runs a story, but they ask the journalist to go to The Daily to comment) that causes a significant debate on the internet.
As always in my markets, this will include significant judgment on my part, I'll try to be fair and I won't bet here.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ214 | |
| 2 | Ṁ177 | |
| 3 | Ṁ29 | |
| 4 | Ṁ20 | |
| 5 | Ṁ20 |
People are also trading
If any bear disagrees, I'll leave some days to argue, but I intend to resolve to YES under the argument made by @CodeSolder
@MP And that it resolved around 2 months after the event, I need to figure out a way to find forgotten markets like this
What about the Artioc situation back in March?
https://www.wired.com/story/deepfakes-twitch-streamers-qtcinderella-atrioc-pokimane/
@CodeSolder For resolution purposes: The Insider and PC Gamer articles both call deepfake tech artificial intelligence or AI, the Wired article does not. All the articles discuss harms of deepfakes. Seems like a likely "YES", given the mention of deepfakes in the market body.
@horse I am skeptical if those are mainstream media outlets under the resolution. Also, I am skeptical if they attracted significant public discussion.
it would be helpful to see more evidence of both
@CodeSolder Insider most definitely is a mainstream outlet, there was a lot of discussion, the posts on Reddit have very high interactions:
It was covered by pretty much all top Twitch streamers:
If that doesn't resolve YES I don't think anything reasonably can
@MP and here is Guardian listed explicitly in the market:
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/mar/13/deepfake-pornography-explosion
@CodeSolder the Verge: https://www.theverge.com/2023/3/7/23629634/twitch-deepfake-porn-ncei-ban-enforcement-atrioc-pokima-ne
Independent: https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/deepfake-ai-qtcinderella-atrioc-b2276802.html?amp
Yahoo Finance (reprinting Kotaku): https://finance.yahoo.com/news/twitch-finally-addresses-porn-deepfake-210000630.html
Vice: https://www.vice.com/en/article/jgp7ky/atrioc-deepfake-porn-apology
Buzzfeed News (not to be confused with Buzzfeed): https://www.buzzfeednews.com/amphtml/stefficao/amouranth-interview-deepfakes-atrioc
More Reddit discussion:
95M views tweet: https://twitter.com/Dexerto/status/1620091517259087874?t=6aUHQ3UoJvVl4-AJnXLU9g&s=19
7M: https://twitter.com/JakeSucky/status/1620093739975983104?t=kcUqWK2Bvc7LTFjA43rcOw&s=19
Keemstar: https://twitter.com/KEEMSTAR/status/1620097030218711042?t=dun3OOkSNkINGwL_49BJkA&s=19
CNN: https://edition.cnn.com/2023/02/16/tech/nonconsensual-deepfake-porn/index.html
NYT: https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/22/business/media/deepfake-regulation-difficulty.html
Guardian again: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/apr/01/ai-deepfake-porn-fake-images
NBC News again: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna75071
WaPo: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/02/13/ai-porn-deepfakes-women-consent/
https://techcrunch.com/2022/11/17/meet-unstable-diffusion-the-group-trying-to-monetize-ai-porn-generators/
Techcrunch story. I don't think it's significant enough, but it seems we're getting closer.
@LivInTheLookingGlass I will solve to YES even if the news isn't particularly accurate technically (journalists aren't known for their machine learning knowledge). So if the text says a plain-vanilla deep fake has AI and it has significant repercussion, I'll solve to YES.
I will certainly discuss and tell you if I am considering to solve to YES after any report.
@MP So a big part of the story is if the media THINKS it is AI generated and covers it as such. Do I get that right?