Will the scientific definition of "superconductor" change by 2025?
23
1kṀ3058resolved Mar 23
Resolved
NO1D
1W
1M
ALL
In the primary LK-99-by-2025 market there is some question of the definition of "superconductor", as the theory of superconductors was built around some assumptions, and LK-99, being apparently anisotropic, either does not exhibit the Meißner–Ochsenfeld effect or has a particularly unusual expression of it. This market asks: will the scientifically-accepted definition of "superconductor" be revised or expanded in time to possibly alter the answer to QuantumObserver's market?
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000 to start trading!
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ194 | |
| 2 | Ṁ33 | |
| 3 | Ṁ28 | |
| 4 | Ṁ15 | |
| 5 | Ṁ12 |
Related questions
Related questions
Will we get room temperature superconductors before 2026?
6% chance
Will there be a popular market on a new claimed superconductor by 2026?
36% chance
Will we get room temperature superconductors before 2035?
32% chance
Will we get room temperature superconductors before 2027?
9% chance
Will we get room temperature superconductors before 2029?
10% chance
Will we get room temperature superconductors before 2028?
9% chance
Will we get room temperature superconductors before 2040?
57% chance
Will a Nobel Prize be awarded for work on superconductors before 2034?
50% chance
Will we get room temperature superconductors before 2032?
17% chance
Will we get room temperature superconductors before 2036?
34% chance