Manifold Team April Retro: What could have gone better?
18
1.1kṀ787resolved Jun 15
24%11%
new search isn't great
21%6%
Free response still a trap
20%7%
No growth this month
9%3%
Private groups taking a long time
7%2%
Our tracking of bugs, features, and projects is a mess
7%2%
Standups are very long and can feel nitpicky/get bogged down in details
7%1.9%
Supabase dev process undocumented, confusing, fragile
5%1.5%
less high value markets than usual/trading on interesting things
1.8%Other
0.0%
Lots of new user testing!
0.7%
Manifund: Not much activity post ACX grant
0.7%
Manifund: Ops taking a lot of time
0.6%
site outage right when isaac was going full degen
1.8%
Manifold gets shared on each Twitter and Reddit 5-10 times per day. Majority gets no engagement.
0.6%
Failed to get streamer subreddit on boad
5%
@Wobbles still hasn't gotten a badge
9%
Many new features have been introduced, though none have seemed to have a large impacted
1.6%
Seems bad to let one person control API keys for hundreds of other users for coordinated activity, one API key per user/use case IMO.
18%
Need to implement guild system for Manifold
26%
Separate leaderboard for predictive and non-predictive markets
Where did we drop the ball? The point of this isn't to point fingers or assign blame, but rather to identify where our processes and strategy are not serving us well.
Mostly, this market is for the Manifold team; don't expect the probabilities, etc to mean much other than like a subjective vote on how much you agree with a particular statement, or how much you want to discuss it.
Last time: https://manifold.markets/JamesGrugett/october-retro-what-could-have-gone
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get 
1,000 to start trading!
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ74 | |
| 2 | Ṁ21 | |
| 3 | Ṁ15 | |
| 4 | Ṁ12 | |
| 5 | Ṁ5 |