MANIFOLD
Will AI generate a decent commercial before 2026?
35
Ṁ1kṀ13k
resolved Jan 3
Resolved
NO

This is a duplicate of the market that resolved NO on 12/31/2024: https://manifold.markets/Jacy/will-ai-generate-a-decent-commercia

Note: This is an effort to make relatively objective, transparent Manifold markets that predict AI capabilities. I won't trade in these markets because there will inevitably be some subjectivity, and I'll try to be responsive with clarifications in the comments (which I will add to the market description). Feedback welcome.

Specifications:

  1. By "decent," I mean that a serious large-sized company would plausibly pay market price to run it for at least 30 seconds in a normal TV context. Ideally, a company will actually run it, but it's okay if the commercial doesn't run but clearly could be (e.g., the company just puts it on YouTube but never pays for TV placement).

  2. There is no restriction on the type of commercial. It can be funny, serious, animated, silent, abstract, etc. Ideally the YES case would be made by showing the AI-generated commercial alongside several comparable human commercials, but that's not required. The easiest examples I have in mind are perfume commercials.

  3. The commercial should not merely succeed because an AI made it. It should be good enough to plausibly be aired if humans made it. Ideally, the commercial would run on TV before it's widely known to be AI-generated, but that seems unlikely and certainly isn't required.

  4. By "generate," I mean the entire commercial should be produced without human intervention (e.g., collating AI clips, adding a soundtrack, adding logos), but humans can select the best AI-generated commercials. The AI system doesn't need to exclusively take text instructions as input, but other specific content should be limited to what's necessary (e.g., a logo, high-resolution images from multiple angles of the product being advertised). The commercial needs to match a real company (e.g., a real logo and product).

  5. If enough details about how the video was made aren't publicly available, I'll take my best guess (i.e., over 50% chance it met each criterion). I will probably consult other AI researchers or engineers if this is contentious.

The spirit of this market (which will be used to resolve ambiguities that aren't resolved by explicit criteria) is whether the AI is capable enough to do all the different tasks it takes to produce a commercial, such as not just generating individual video shots but sequencing them together in a compelling way.

  • Update 2025-12-28 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Humans can develop the idea, storyboard, and script for the commercial as long as the input to the AI system stays within the stated requirements (e.g., text instructions, logos, high-resolution product images). The AI does not need to autonomously generate these creative planning elements.

  • Update 2025-12-28 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The McDonald's AI-generated Christmas commercial that was briefly aired does not qualify for resolution, as confirmed by the creator.

Market context
Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#TraderTotal profit
1Ṁ427
2Ṁ314
3Ṁ210
4Ṁ203
5Ṁ201
Sort by:

I take it that nobody wants to make an argument for YES resolution at this point, but I encourage anyone to do so if you've seen something good. I'll reiterate that I think there are some artsy perfume-type commercials that seem much easier to generate than ones like the McDonald's Christmas ad.

bought Ṁ50 YES

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpWCvItr55c

McDonald's ran this AI ad briefly. only pulled it because of public backlash but it was good enough for them to air

bought Ṁ1,500 NO

@RS This is very obviously not generated from one prompt. Fails criteria 4 and 5

The AI ad company said it took seven weeks to generate. Definitely took a lot of human work there.

This is the ad that allegedly was aired on TV if anyone's interested.

For extra fun, imagine you're a devout Christian, who loves Christmas, and doesn't like AI very much.

@TiredCliche I don't know all the public details (e.g., what the ad company has revealed), but for the record, I agree this commercial does not qualify.

Just saw a "Santa Quits" ad by AI company "Mirakl." It is clearly not generated from a prompt, and they chose to only run it on digital. And despite it being the best AI ad I have seen, it still looks awful... Even Santa's wink looks incredibly strange. At one point Santa's hair just fades into different hair as he turns.

Not ready for primetime! Wonder how much they spent.

whether the AI is capable enough to do all the different tasks it takes to produce a commercial

I've been assuming that this includes developing the idea for the ad, storyboarding, developing the script, etc. Is that correct?

@MaxMorehead The human could do those things as long as the input to the AI system is within the requirements (e.g., the human can input high-resolution image of a new product to ensure it gets the details correct).

This ticks a lot of boxes, but not all, I guess there were humans promting different clips and arraging them. Coca Cola is big company and they used the clip for active advertisment. All vidoes are AI generated as far as I can tell (also with some editing like the logo at the end and the music, also not generated): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yy6fByUmPuE

bought Ṁ150 NO

Just got an AI commercial on YouTube about, something, unclear. The top half was a bikini woman and the bottom half was cutting thing up satisfyingly or whatever. I don't have TikTok.

Also why does something like this not count? Is it because it was presumably cut together rather than generated in full? What if it is not as clear what has been done (i.e, it is not clear whether it is a raw output or whether it was altered).

What if there is a commercial but it is released by e.g an AI company as a demo, rather than picked up by an actual company?

© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy