Will a US government official use both UFOs and the switch to X.com as a talking point before LK99 is (dis)proved?
9
Ṁ190Ṁ350resolved Jan 15
Resolved
NO1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
By "talking point" I mean that either of these used in an official or televized debate, political argument, campaign speech, or in any public exercise of their function that is demonstrably theirs (i.e. single tweets about either of these would not suffice). By (dis)proved I mean that a meaningful consensus has been reached on whether LK99 is a room-temperature, ambient pressure superconductor.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Market context
Get
1,000 to start trading!
🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ16 | |
| 2 | Ṁ13 | |
| 3 | Ṁ8 | |
| 4 | Ṁ1 |
People are also trading
Related questions
When in 2026 will US federal government present a new narrative, with documentation, regarding UAP/UFO events?
Will the US confirm that aliens exist before 2027?
7% chance
Will a US President (or Presidential Task Force) confirm an extraterrestrial or non-human intelligence by 2030?
34% chance
US president makes official announcement confirming UFOs or extraterrestrials before 2033?
38% chance
Which public figures will declare they believe aliens have been hidden by the US government?
Will the US Government make a show of declassifying everything on UFOs / UAPs before 2030
45% chance
Will the U.S. confirm that aliens exist before 2027?
9% chance
When will the U.S. government confirm that the Roswell incident was an actual UFO crash?
Will U.S. Army Col. Karl Nell ever claim under oath that aliens exist?
22% chance