Will the campaign to redefine the concept of "sex" on Wikipedia be successful?
28
625Ṁ4012
resolved Jan 26
Resolved
NO

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Sex

This is a duplicate of this market, with clearer resolution criteria and timeframe.

This market resolves once no new comments about it have been posted on the relevant Wikipedia talk pages in 1 month, and there is not some pending decision being awaited that's likely to come soon.


If there is a clear "winner" that most people agree on, the market resolves in that direction. Otherwise it resolves based on whether the introduction still refers to gametes and/or chromosomes as the primary factor in the core definition of the term. Other minor factors are acceptable, but if anything else is on par with chromosomes and/or gametes, this resolves YES.

Given the subjectivity and controversialness of this topic, I won't bet. Please ask any clarifying questions in the comments and I'll update this description as necessary in accordance with the spirit of the market.

Please do not comment on the Wikipedia page if you don't have something meaningful to add, they have a policy against canvassing. This market is intended to be predictive only.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ117
2Ṁ64
3Ṁ26
4Ṁ22
5Ṁ11
© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy