If I write an encyclopedia of bad AI arguments, will people seem to find it useful?
44
1kṀ20402026
79%
chance
1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
AI discourse has a lot of repetitive, terrible arguments, from both sides, often from pretty intelligent people. I was thinking of writing up a list of them along with in-depth rebuttals. Not sure if people would use it though, since presumably most of the people making bad arguments are doing so because they don't want to think too hard or read a lot of text.
This market resolves YES if the post gets more positive engagement than most of my blog posts. For example, 10 people all say "this is cool, I'm going to use this" or similar. Or one popular person says they found it useful. It resolves NO if there's crickets and my effort seems to have been wasted.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000 to start trading!
People are also trading
Related questions
Will "What are the best arguments for/against AIs b..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will an AI produce encyclopedia-worthy philosophy by 2026?
15% chance
Will "Counting arguments provide no evidence for AI..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Ten arguments that AI is an existential risk" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Many arguments for AI x-risk are wrong" make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
22% chance
Will AI benefit common knowledge?
80% chance
Will "The case for ensuring that powerful AIs are c..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
88% chance
Will "things that confuse me about the current AI m..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
13% chance
Will "A breakdown of AI capability levels focused o..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
14% chance
Will "Access to powerful AI might make computer sec..." make the top fifty posts in LessWrong's 2024 Annual Review?
13% chance