🏅 Top traders

So what now

@Holdino All good now. It stays resolved as is. Thanks!

@ mods please ignore requests below, dispute was resolved amicably.

@xjp im glad to please you!

@Holdino your random number is: 78

Salt: m3go5t5jqy, round: 5883972 (signature b09d83371ca950596c91dd8e6d1a8efcfb74384197d305b22866a2074b83d6e78a350ef1ece08f088081424ba4dbaa430d214504b6ac915981d0dae50fccf1a6019e629d2cfcfd5fbdde3601558b12a0f44689ea3e8fad4e2470b534f372ffcc)

@Holdino you asked for a random integer between 1 and 100, inclusive. Coming up shortly!

Source: GitHub, previous round: 5883970 (latest), offset: 2, selected round: 5883972, salt: m3go5t5jqy.

@FairlyRandom 100

@mods I'm not sure if I have any recourse here but I feel that it would be fair to require that this resolves according to a "@ FairlyRandom 100" roll. As I stated in my other comment OP is a regular participant in random chance based markets and knows the community precedent of using verifiable random sources for fairness. As is, it really seems like OP simply resolved YES for profit because they bought YES shares, without even stating a random number. They are also AFK and haven't answered my comments.

So: I request that a mod rolls "@ FairlyRandom 100" and resolves according to the outcome. Or, if that feels like too much meddling, N/A would also be fine with me.

As further evidence for my case I would like to point out that OP also originally bought up this supposedly 45% probability market to nearly 70%, which is an indication that they didn't plan on resolving fairly and were always just going to resolve in their favour.

@xjp tbh bro idrc this is a game with fake money that my friend and i found and play in class, resolved fairly with him by just using a number generator i he was invested in the other side so we didn’t like rig it together one of us would’ve won. so maybe just chill out. grown ah man hating on some kids

@xjp Agreed, would be nice if @mods could weigh in.

@4fa

@Holdino I'm not hating and I didn't know you were kids. You weren't answering my comments and I wanted to make sure the market was fair. Would you agree to tag "@FairlyRandom 100" like the other chance-based markets and re-resolve based on that:?

@xjp sure man whatever floats your boat completely apologize

@xjp how do i re resolve after i closed it?

@Holdino Go ahead and roll in a separate comment above, and if necessary (if it rolls NO) then we ask mods to change it

@Holdino Please use a verifiable and independent source of random numbers for resolution, especially when you yourself are invested in the market. Otherwise the market cannot be fair and it comes across as an attempt to cheat people, which I hope is not your intention. I can see that you have participated many times in "Daily Coinflip" and "Do you like x% odds?" markets so I'm sure you know that the standard for these markets is to use the @ FairlyRandom bot to choose the outcome.

@xjp

@Lincoln I look like this and say this

@BenjaminRutti sorry

@xjp i prefer alternative methods

@Holdino Please resolve