Will IsaacKing buy >1 million mana before the Whales vs. Minnows resolves?
36
305
710
resolved Apr 25
Resolved
YES

Will @IsaacKing buy more than one million mana (worth 10,000 USD) before the Whales vs. Minnows market resolves? It had been hypothesized that buying mana will be one of the ways that he can make the market resolve in his favor.

The mana must be purchased directly from Manifold, but it can be purchased through a way that isn't normally available (such as writing them a check, doing a bank transfer, or delivering them cash in person).

The mana does not need to be used on the Whales vs. Minnows market; it just needs to be bought before that market resolves. For that timing, see the Whales vs. Minnows market.

2023-04-14: Clarification: If Isaac buys the mana for less than 10,000 USD, because of a bulk discount, this still resolves based on the quantity of mana. However, if he receives the mana for free or at an insane discount (such as for only 100 USD) then it will resolve NO.

Get Ṁ200 play money

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ527
2Ṁ440
3Ṁ224
4Ṁ123
5Ṁ77
Sort by:

Resolves YES. Isaac has said so, and you can confirm by looking at his portfolio graph.

predicted YES

This can resolve.

bought Ṁ325 of YES

Isaac has claimed to have already bought 1.5 million mana.

Clarification: the mana must have been bought after this market was created. Mana bought before this market was created is not included. Hopefully that aligns with what everyone expected - please let me know if not.

In potentially relevant news, mana can now be bought in increments of M$100,000.

predicted YES
bought Ṁ50 of NO

Commented this in CodeandSoldier's market (seen below)

but see:

He still may have received $8,000 funding, or is willing to go into debt, or has been working to earn that money.

@KyleWan or could have sold any number of liquid investments, in general "can he access $10k" when he stated he spent $100k on pretty cardboard resolves to yes, I think

bought Ṁ5 of YES

Worth noting that many of these secondary wvm markets are being used as insurance or hedges by investors in the original market (such as), and the mass of investors in the original wvm market is large enough that I don't think these will convey the market's actual probabilities.

predicted YES

@chinmay If their probabilities are wrong then others can turn a profit by correcting them.

predicted YES

@IsaacKing if for example almost everyone who looks at the secondary market is an investor in the main market, then it's not clear that they are better off correcting the market, because it might expose them further to the downside of the main market. And I think this main market is currently popular enough that this might be the case! But yes, in the long run, enough disinterested parties will see it and correct it.

Seems like the probability should be closer with my market?