The creator never responded to the key question proposed by @AviSchwartz on the very first day. I'm going to N/A this because of the absence of the creator and lack of clarification for several weeks.

I understand some participants may wish they got a payout from their good bets, but since we never got any clarification, our moderator guidelines 'recommend' an N/A:

> If a market resolution has some ambiguity and there is dispute over the correct resolution, the creator will have the final say. However, we usually recommend an N/A resolution under these circumstances, especially if the ambiguity is at the fault of the creator.

@CarineBelleF Can this resolve? If not, should it be extended?

I understand she was not actually pregnant. So although she was released I understand there was no baby. So— resolved No?

@CarineBelleF Nathavaree Mulkan, the Thai citizen who was falsely described by Sara Netanyahu in a letter to Jill Biden as having been pregnant & having given birth in captivity, is among the hostages released tonight. The hospital reports she is in good condition.

@AviSchwartz So N/A?

@CarineBelleF How would you resolve this market if the reports about a hostage giving birth are unfounded and verified as being false?

@AviSchwartz If she doesn’t exist, she can’t be repatriated.

On the other hand, if a different hostage gave birth and both she and her child were repatriated to Israel, even if the one mentioned exists and isn’t, the question would resolve yes.

@DanPowell She exists. Her child may not.

@DanPowell If the set is empty, every assertion is always true. But I would say that it will simply be solved with N/A.

@Emanuele98 Nothing is true of at least one member of the empty set.

@DanPowell It doesn't say at least one.

@Emanuele98 It also doesn’t say all.

@DanPowell yes, But as I said, it simply will be N/A, these are "tricks" of set theory.