Background
Donald Trump has proposed a "Gold Card" program as an alternative to the existing EB-5 investor visa program. The Gold Card would reportedly cost $5 million per card, compared to the current EB-5 program which requires a minimum investment of $800,000 to $1.05 million. Trump has suggested these cards could generate significant revenue, with ambitious claims of potentially selling up to one million cards (which would theoretically generate $5 trillion).
The current EB-5 visa program typically issues fewer than 10,000 visas annually. The Gold Card program would target wealthy foreign nationals seeking expedited paths to U.S. residency.
Resolution Criteria
This market will resolve to the total number of Trump Gold Cards sold during the 2025 calendar year (January 1, 2025 - December 31, 2025).
If the Gold Card program is not implemented or officially launched by the end of 2025, this market will resolve to 0.
If official government data on Gold Card sales is not publicly available, resolution will be based on credible media reports or official statements from the Trump administration regarding the number of cards sold.
Lutnick confirms they’ve sold 1000 in a single day
Is that enough to resolve all options below 1000 as No @Bayesian? Or would you need more concrete confirmation of that figure?
@elf Since these options are linked multiple choice, i cant resolve some options early. I can’t say for sure whether these count or he’s misstating things, but those would probably count? I don’t know the details for these gold cards already sold but at the end of the year i’ll make a more precise accounting of the total count
This all doesn't make much sense to me. Lutnick is the Secretary of Commerce, but visas are managed by the State Department. The requirements for the existing EB-5 investor visa have been defined by act of Congress. There's no mention of the new gold card that I can find on the Commerce or State department websites. So I suspect that "sold" is being used here in a very loose sense.
I have no idea on what basis the administration thinks they can set visa requirements without congressional approval (other than, okay, this administration thinks the law doesn't exist and they can do anything, I guess). @Bayesian How will you handle this market if cards are sold but their legal status is in question?
@elf I'd love to bet on how many are in use. That seems more solid than the hard to evaluate "sold" state.
@elf what account do we think the Commerce Secretary is putting the money in? Just straight into the treasury?
Also if l were going to throw down even $1 mil I’d want a receipt, plus proof that a path to my green card actually existed.
Seems like selling 1,000 passes to become US citizens, a process that ordinarily takes years and much coordination across government agencies, at $5 mil each should have more of a paper trail than a post on Xitter.
What if I’m a leader of Tren de Aragua? Plausible, since when other countries have tried this type of citizenship program it has mostly appealed to organized criminals. What do I show ICE so they don’t load me on a plane?
Or maybe it’s worth considering that perhaps the Commerce Secretary was exaggerating some aspect of the claim about selling 1,000 already to generate hype and manufacture legitimacy?
@jcb My feeling is that they have to be real usable visas issued by the Department of State (not just like, concepts of a visa), but that any potential legal challenges should be irrelevant.
@n_t sub “greencard with a path to citizenship” for “visa” as they are not the same thing and the former is what was promised
@jcb correct. rough estimate:
0.03*100,000+0.03*66,000+0.03*17,000+0.05*7500+0.05*3800+0.05*1800+0.15*600+0.20*50+0.42*0 = 6245
@Bayesian ok, wow. And I think the actual probability distribution doesn't even need to be fat tailed for this to be a problem, since because of interest rate considerations, buckets are unlikely to be driven near to 0. So the mean heavily depends on what categories the market creator defines!
Median seems like a more illuminating (or at least equally illuminating) summary statistic.
@MingCat I think CSS3 web colors typically use a float for alpha and either a byte or a percentage for rgb