Siege = ground offensive
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ655 | |
| 2 | Ṁ147 | |
| 3 | Ṁ142 | |
| 4 | Ṁ126 | |
| 5 | Ṁ122 |
People are also trading
https://twitter.com/JulianRoepcke/status/1718924497435205869
The Israeli Army penetrated 6 km deep into the central Gaza Strip, set a roadblock at the Salah Al Deen road and by this effectively cut Gaza City and the northern camps from the rest of the strip.
Is that enough?
They seem to have stayed into morning. https://x.com/sentdefender/status/1718139906327810524?s=46&t=ysuToRHdvIMAo_KadMtpHA
Ignoring that siege was a really poor word choice here (since you clarified that you meant the opposite in the description), what scale of attack would you consider a sufficient ground offensive @BTE ?
@Panfilo Question length limit prevented better options. I am talking about full offensive. Not random incursion by special forces.
@BTE So right now they seem to be doing escalated smaller incursions that are bigger than special forces but smaller than "full scale invasion by 300,000 reservists". Will continued sorties of 10 or 20 tanks count, or is that too small scale?
@BTE yesternight: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pA4MTKiAQBM Shows 11 tanks in one of the shots, shows other tanks elsewhere.
@BTE Yep, they are announcing that they are expanding this method today. A steady increase of tank attacks that strike hundreds of targets on the ground might be harder to call "full-scale" at any one moment, but it feels like what they may have meant all along?