
I see no reason to be hasty but I do anticipate closing this soonish.
Possible clarification from creator (AI generated):
Market will resolve YES if the shooter is found dead
Possible clarification from creator (AI generated): The shooter does not need to be convicted to resolve YES - being caught/found is sufficient.
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ1,521 | |
| 2 | Ṁ545 | |
| 3 | Ṁ382 | |
| 4 | Ṁ373 | |
| 5 | Ṁ282 |
People are also trading
Hard to say for sure, but these cases don’t always go cold as fast as people think. With how advanced IP and geolocation analytics have become I’ve checked out breakdowns like https://www.iplocation.net/how-geolocation-and-ip-analytics-are-reshaping-modern-industries it’s surprising how much digital trace can be recovered even months later. From my own experience using similar tools for analytics, they can reveal way more than you expect. So yeah, there’s definitely a chance things move quietly behind the scenes.
A lot of these discussions about healthcare chaos remind me how much smoother things get when tech actually works for people. I once came across this resource https://macsources.com/advancing-healthcare-access-solutions-in-pharmacy-app-development/ and it showed how well-built pharmacy apps can fix basic access issues. After trying similar tools myself, the improvement in speed and clarity was noticeable.
@Lop clearance rates for murders in NY are only 50%. I think the fact this murder is atypical probably makes it less likely to be solved, not more. The fact this is trading at 75% reflects the market's belief that the police is going to go the extra mile on this one, because it's a high profile case that involves a rich guy.
@Odoacre I was thinking the same way. Ppl have too much faith in the system. It's not as good as we think it may be.