Update 2025-09-10 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - If it's ambiguous whether the shooter is male, this market will resolve to N/A.
Update 2025-09-16 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - For Acted alone (no accomplices): any accomplice associated with the shooting counts, including after-the-fact assistance (e.g., destroying evidence). If any such accomplice exists, this answer will not resolve as true.
Update 2025-10-18 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - A conviction or guilty plea in court would be sufficient evidence to resolve answers about the shooter's identity
Direct evidence would be sufficient
Circumstantial evidence or evidence described as "seemingly" implicating someone would not be sufficient to resolve
Update 2025-12-18 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - The market will resolve in the case of a guilty plea (in addition to a conviction in court)
People are also trading
@vdb Please resolve
"The shooter is a member of domain Bacteria": NO
"The shooter is not a extraterrestrial alien": YES
"Not arrested as of midnight EST 9/14": NO
"used telekinesis to correct the bullet's trajectory": NO.
If you do, I will give you 12 mana as appreciation. If you are thinking that there is a risk it might be misresolved, there is always the unresolve button that the mods can use, so resolving it early for obvious options is fine.
Why are the options
"The shooter is a member of domain Eukarya"
"The shooter killed Charlie Kirk"
"is in fact three racoons dressed in a trenchcoat"
"Not arrested as of midnight EST 9/14"
"Meant to hit an apple on Charlie Kirk's head"
"Did it on purpose" etc.
resolve in the obvious directions? It is a near impossibility that these options do not resolve in the obvious directions.
Can you tell me why these options are not being resolved?




