Will I be convinced: quantum-to-classical transition and Quantum Darwinism
1
300Ṁ60Dec 20
41%
chance
1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
In this paper, Javier Sánchez-Cañizares claims that Zurek's existential interpretation of quantum mechanics "provides little progress in understanding the quantum-to-classical transition."
Zurek replies that "Quantum Darwinism puts them [concerns such as Sánchez-Cañizares'] conclusively to rest."
After reading both authors' articles somewhat more carefully, will I be convinced that Sánchez-Cañizares' concern is put to rest by Quantum Darwinism?
See my study notes for my comments/opinions on related topics.
I will not bet on this market.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000 to start trading!
People are also trading
Related questions
Will quantum computers simulate complex biological systems faster or more accurately than classical computers by 2026?
5% chance
Will I significantly deconvert Eliezer Yudkowsky from Bayesianism by the end of 2025?
1% chance
Will the scientific community accept aspects of quantum consciousness by 2030? 🧠🔬⚛️🌀
15% chance
What'll be the conclusions of a large study into the ease of learning quantum mechanics with different interpretations?
Will relational quantum mechanics become the consensus view by the end of 2040?
10% chance
Which interpretation of quantum mechanics will be accepted by 2030
When (if ever) will objective-collapse theory overthrow quantum theory?
By the beginning of 2035, will physicists and philosophers mostly agree on the correct interpretation of quantum mechanics?
11% chance
Is the brain quantum?
25% chance
When (if ever) will Bohmian mechanics overthrow quantum theory?