Should humanity prevent wild animals from harming each other?
11
2026
Yes, humanity should intervene to prevent excess wild animal suffering beyond what is necessary to sustain wild carnivores
Yes, humans should drive all naturally carnivorous species to extinction and monitor ecological systems to prevent them from evolving
No, humans should not interfere with harms that come to wild animals: all methods of doing so would be more unethical and cause more suffering by acting against nature
No, humans should not interfere, the suffering of wild animals is not the responsibility of humanity
Other (explain in comments)
See results

Wild animals suffer immensely due to predation and abuse from other wild animals. Should humanity actively intervene to prevent wild animals like predators from eating other animals, and use our intelligence to devise ways to feed them in ways that don't require animal suffering?

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:

  1. Carnivores continue to exist.

  2. The biosphere is as it is.

  3. But the entire ecosystem is being monitored/manipulated by incredibly advanced tech.

  4. So whenever a predator seems to kill an animal, they're only killing a specially created remote remote-controlled meat drone.

  5. The population of all species is kept within limits to avoid famine through he use of targeted sterilisation

  6. Real carnivores only encounter real herbivores under carefully controlled conditions where there is no chance of a predatory attack, and even if it did happen, sentinel drones would immediately interven

  7. But on the surface, everything looks like a normal, healthy flourishing ecosystem.

@PhilosophyBear unfathomably based and tomasikpilled

People are also trading

© Manifold Markets, Inc.•Terms•Privacy