I would like traders to consider that, if balls were to undergo a meteoric rise from lowest to winner, firstly that those trading would make a bunch, and secondly that it would be very funny, possibly Manifold Lore worthy

@TheAllMemeingEye consider the following advocacy pieces

[deleted, forgot to repost]

can this market resolve to “other”?

@Social_Anthrax i'm gonna say no

@TimothyBandors The first remotely reasonable market I've ever seen this option on.

🐾

@atmidnight 🐈

Just for future reference: I'm not going to remove any already-existing answers, but I'd prefer that we stick to only listing single factors. The multi factor answers take the fun out of it imo

@redcathode Yeah I was just making a point by doing it too lol

By combining a trader number market with a linked multiple choice market, we seem to have created the strange situation where any newly added option gets a huge head start even if it's trash lol

all in favor of editing this to just say "balls"?

@redcathode i kid i kid

Kudos to @spiderduckpig , the one user brave enough to vote yes on balls

Not the hero we deserve, but the one we need

@remedyrain Arguably kinda cheating, I think it's implied it's meant to be "which ONE factor is MOST important", not "what are all the factors"

@TheAllMemeingEye yea maybe

@TheAllMemeingEye yea, but I'll allow it

I'm assuming "highest trader number" here means highest net trader number (number of yes traders minus number of no traders), right?

@TheAllMemeingEye Yeah, I should've been more specific - will update description.

@redcathode whatever it is, it's not balls

@StopPunting relevant

lmao nerds