Is Nick Cammarata right: LLM will be able to mechanistically audit own circuits and explain ghiblification in 2Y?
6
100Ṁ109
2027
34%
chance

Background

This is based on this Nick Cammarata tweet thread.

https://x.com/nickcammarata/status/1905321653401518517?s=46

“I’m at like 80% that in two years we’ll be able to get 4o to mechanistically audit its own circuits and explain what the core ideas behind ghiblification are“

Resolution Criteria

I will try to ask Nick on Twitter or find another sensible resolution.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:

Can you specify a bit more in detail what level of detail of the explanation must be to resolve yes? Is it enough to give generic description? ("A neutral network of this and this architecture needs to be train on this data")? Does the LLM need to be able to write a program with no training data that can do the job? (The other extreme)

© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules