Is Nick Cammarata right: LLM will be able to mechanistically audit own circuits and explain ghiblification in 2Y?
6
100Ṁ1092027
34%
chance
1D
1W
1M
ALL
Background
This is based on this Nick Cammarata tweet thread.
https://x.com/nickcammarata/status/1905321653401518517?s=46
“I’m at like 80% that in two years we’ll be able to get 4o to mechanistically audit its own circuits and explain what the core ideas behind ghiblification are“
Resolution Criteria
I will try to ask Nick on Twitter or find another sensible resolution.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Get
1,000 to start trading!
Related questions
Related questions
Will LLMs be able to formally verify non-trivial programs by the end of 2025?
31% chance
Are LLMs capable of reaching AGI?
74% chance
LLM Hallucination: Will an LLM score >90% on SimpleQA before 2026?
60% chance
Will LLM based systems have debugging ability comparable to a human by 2030?
68% chance
Will one of the major LLMs be capable of continual lifelong learning (learning from inference runs) by EOY 2025?
26% chance
LLMs by EOY 2025: Will Retentive Learning Surpass Transformers? (Subsidised 400 M$)
14% chance
Will LLM inference for the largest models run on analogue circuitry as the primary element of computuation by end 2028?
19% chance
Will there be major breakthrough in LLM Continual Learning before 2026?
40% chance
EOY 2025: Will open LLMs match closed-source LLMs on coding to within 50 ELO points?
39% chance
Will there be an LLM which scores above what a human can do in 2 hours on METR's eval suite before 2026?
80% chance