For the resolution process I'll put out a spreadsheet to count them and receive feedback from community. The count is the number of markets in https://manifold.markets/group/improperly-resolved that look like a valid misresolution, have >3 traders, and not marked as "test".
On Nov 18 there were approximately ~25.
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ7 | |
| 2 | Ṁ5 | |
| 3 | Ṁ2 | |
| 4 | Ṁ2 |
@o At least one of those looks like something I'd quibble about being a "misresolution":
https://manifold.markets/ussgordoncaptain/will-xi-jinping-be-president-of-chi
resolved N/A because the end date was unclear.
I'd very much like to not set the community norm that resolving N/A because of an unintended ambiguity is as big of a red flag as resolving a clear YES as a NO or vice versa.
Hmm, this market seems to have itself been improperly resolved (in a minor way, not a big way).
"I'll put out a spreadsheet to count them and receive feedback from community" - the feedback part didn't happen. There are a small number of markets that I think are mislabeled, e.g. https://manifold.markets/ManifoldMarkets/plastic-straws-should-be-banned looks properly resolved to me.