Will this trial find that paying people to lose weight results in more weight loss than usual care?
30
22
100
resolved Mar 21
Resolved
YES
The comparison is between the: - Outcome-based group ($50-100 a month if they lose ≥1.5% to <2.5% of baseline weight or $100-150 a month if they lose ≥2.5% of baseline weight) + all the control group stuff. - Control group: fitbit, food diary, referral to weight watchers etc. The outcome measure: Percentage of patients who achieve 5% reduction from Baseline Weight at 6 months. If the confidence intervals don't include 0, it resolves to yes. Here is the trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03157713?term=behavioral+economics&recrs=e&rslt=Without&type=Intr&draw=3&rank=58
Get Ṁ200 play money

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ40
2Ṁ36
3Ṁ31
4Ṁ20
5Ṁ20
Sort by:
predicted NO

Results here: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/article-abstract/2799223. "At 6 months, the adjusted proportion of patients who lost at least 5% of baseline weight was 22.1% in the resources-only group, 39.0% in the goal-directed group, and 49.1% in the outcome-based incentive group (difference, 10.08 percentage points [95% CI, 1.31-18.85] for outcome based vs goal directed; difference, 27.03 percentage points [95% CI, 18.20-35.86] and 16.95 percentage points [95% CI, 8.18-25.72] for outcome based or goal directed vs resources only, respectively)".

And I bet no.

predicted NO
yep - waiting for the results to get published.
predicted YES
Is this intentionally closed-but-not-resolved?
bought Ṁ20 of NO
buying "no" on loan mostly because lots of studies find no statistically significant effect.
bought Ṁ5 of NO
I'd guess the intervention probably does work, but will the confidence intervals include 0? In this (doi:10.1111/obr.12657) review of 12 studies, only 4 had p<.05. The study in question has a decent sample size, but they have also selected a binary (% with 5% loss) as the main outcome and, afaik, you lose power with a binary outcome. All in all, I think there is a reasonable chance of a non-significant difference.