Will this trial find that paying people to lose weight results in more weight loss than usual care?
30
22
Ṁ902Ṁ100
resolved Mar 21
Resolved
YES1D
1W
1M
ALL
The comparison is between the:
- Outcome-based group ($50-100 a month if they lose ≥1.5% to <2.5% of baseline weight or $100-150 a month if they lose ≥2.5% of baseline weight) + all the control group stuff.
- Control group: fitbit, food diary, referral to weight watchers etc.
The outcome measure: Percentage of patients who achieve 5% reduction from Baseline Weight at 6 months. If the confidence intervals don't include 0, it resolves to yes.
Here is the trial registration:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03157713?term=behavioral+economics&recrs=e&rslt=Without&type=Intr&draw=3&rank=58
Get Ṁ200 play money
Related questions
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ40 | |
2 | Ṁ36 | |
3 | Ṁ31 | |
4 | Ṁ20 | |
5 | Ṁ20 |
Sort by:
Results here: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/article-abstract/2799223. "At 6 months, the adjusted proportion of patients who lost at least 5% of baseline weight was 22.1% in the resources-only group, 39.0% in the goal-directed group, and 49.1% in the outcome-based incentive group (difference, 10.08 percentage points [95% CI, 1.31-18.85] for outcome based vs goal directed; difference, 27.03 percentage points [95% CI, 18.20-35.86] and 16.95 percentage points [95% CI, 8.18-25.72] for outcome based or goal directed vs resources only, respectively)".
And I bet no.
I'd guess the intervention probably does work, but will the confidence intervals include 0? In this (doi:10.1111/obr.12657) review of 12 studies, only 4 had p<.05. The study in question has a decent sample size, but they have also selected a binary (% with 5% loss) as the main outcome and, afaik, you lose power with a binary outcome. All in all, I think there is a reasonable chance of a non-significant difference.
More related questions
Related questions
Will the “simple portion control plan” succeed?
[5k subsidy] Will “minimum viable restrictive diet” succeed?
Would an RCT find that vegetarian is healthier than vegan?
40% chance
By 2030, will any treatment be shown to increase human lifespan in a randomized controlled trial?
Will the "wild parrot diet" (eating what parrots eat) be shown to be healthier than eating the "standard American diet"?
42% chance
Will weight-loss drugs power a 1% annual growth increase in US GDP?
19% chance
Will there be medical consensus that GLP-1 drugs have cardiovascular benefits beyond those provided via weight loss?
66% chance
Will a clinical trial reporting weight-loss benefits of a GLP-1 agonist be published in a major medical journal in 2024?
82% chance
Will Medicare or Medicaid cover weight loss drugs by 2029?
76% chance
Will the contaminant hypothesis of modern obesity be judged true by expert consensus before 2025?
3% chance