100+ means 100 or more.
Resolves NO if there are 99 or less unique traders.

Will this resolve early if there are 100+ traders before March 1st? I'm suspicious of "by time of closing" versus "at time of closing" phrases.



@KCS It's based on the unqiue trader number which can only go up





@levifinkelstein Hmm, now that I thought more, I think I miscalculated that it automatically would give you ~100 unique participant mana bonuses. Some reverse inference happened.

@degtorad haha, like I could ask a question then resolve it YES and suddenly I'm god emperor of universe?

@levifinkelstein Something like that, though that was a fruit of undifferentiated thought so there can’t really be any similarities with defined wordy stuff. I think that’s akin to semantic hallucinations encountered in droves when dreaming.
If someone moves this market a lot, it will be featured on the front page algorithmically.

@VitorBosshard I think it might be taboo to engage in manipulation like this
@levifinkelstein Why do you think this? What if I bet on a market that we'll have AGI in 2030 and then dedicated myself to build one? It's not insider trading, collusion, fake users, or anything like that (I understand why people often are against all of these). I'm just creating the world I want to live in ;)








