I’m guessing there will be a clear consensus by EOY 2025 on what this is called. If there is not, I will make a good faith judgement call on Jan 1, 2026, informed by Google Trends, Miriam-Webster, and whatever other relevant tools are available. I will not bet on this market, to remain neutral.
🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ113 | |
| 2 | Ṁ101 | |
| 3 | Ṁ85 | |
| 4 | Ṁ84 | |
| 5 | Ṁ82 |
People are also trading
After staring at Google trends (all basically empty for the proposed names here) and double-checking some friends' sense of the zeitgeist, I didn't get the clear sense that there was any specific name that had caught on. Some of the discussion indicated that the question was ambiguous, but none of the proposed names seems to have caught on for any of the plausible meanings. Compare to some other terms that achieved obvious consensus (slop, vibe coding, etc.), and I concluded the most reasonable conclusion was 100% "no special name".
Doomers and Safetyests are basically all technolibertarians about every technology other than AI, and like half of them are actively building AGI, so if that ends up being the term, yall are idiots.
@makoyass The people campaigning against AI art seem like a better candidate. Not sure what they're called. (ftr I think their concerns are reasonable today, but predictably wont be 5 years from now when genuinely useful AI art tooling is a thing, and their campaign to slow that down is all dvesha)