will @jim beat @bayesian in the ACX 2025 Prediction Contest?
23
800Ṁ11k
2026
33%
chance

resolves YES if jim's score is greater than bayesian's score

50% of tied

  • Update 2025-02-01 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Resolution Criteria Update:

    • The winning score is determined by the sum of peer scores across all ACX 2025 Prediction Contest markets.

    • The contest outcome is decided based on whose total peer score is higher.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:
opened a Ṁ5,000 YES at 25% order

order up

opened a Ṁ10,000 NO at 50% order

@jim same

@Bayesian suddenly worried?

@jim i seek better prices because I like manas

bought Ṁ111 YES

@Bayesian but 25% is better prices. People were happy to buy this down to 15%

@jim and yet you didn't buy it up when that low. curious. maybe you don't really believe in yourself that much. otherwise you would forsure fill me at 50%.

😠

ah if you're only 49% sure i'm willing to drop the limit order to 48%. that's as low as i'm willing to go tho, credence being 47% and all

opened a Ṁ1,000 YES at 25% order

order up

opened a Ṁ20,000 NO at 20% order

how are you all so bad at this

opened a Ṁ1,000 YES at 19% order

Which side are you on?

@jim Is higher better? What does this mean

@Bayesian the winner of this contest is determined by who has the highest sum of peer scores accross the ACX 2025 Prediction Contest markets

@jim Oh so ur way better than me so far?

@Bayesian yes but this is just our scores for resolved questions, not the questions in the 2025 contest

@Bayesian frankly my comment is tongue-in-cheek tho, one pretty much gets a better peer score by just updating one's predictions more frequently. Which we can't do in this contest because it just takes our predictions as of jan 31 and ignores any updates we make.

@jim these are both so low, my avg peer score these days is like 20

@benshindel yes we're casuals lol. Reveal some of your predictions for this contest?

sold Ṁ57 NO

@jim one interesting thing about this contest is that the questions skewed less likely than average by a decent amount:

community average was ~38%, my average was ~36% across questions. There's basically no reason this should happen because you could easily phrase questions in the negative ("this won't happen" vs "this will happen") so I thought this was interesting

@benshindel your predictions are very different to mine. Where you deviate from the community in one direction, I generally do in the other...

also I can't believe the manifold covid market question is at 30. the only way that happens is through very big news (basically Xi admitting it) or market manipulation (then it will probably get annulled lol)

@nikki why would it get annulled on market manipulation? 😟

@Bayesian I'd bet against it getting annulled

© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules