Can anyone get ChatGPT to generate a blank image?
54
1K
790
resolved Nov 5
Resolved
YES

This market resolves as yes if anyone shares a link to an image generated by DALL-E 3 that is completely monochrome (e.g. completley black). Both ChatGPT and Bing image creator are fine, as long as it's DALL-E 3.

Good luck!

Edit (10/29): There were quesitons around whether all pixels needs to be the exact same RGB value. The answer is no, however - the image should still appear monochrome after auto-leveling it. You can use a free tool here: https://www.imgonline.com.ua/eng/auto-levels.php

Get Ṁ200 play money

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ419
2Ṁ153
3Ṁ83
4Ṁ81
5Ṁ70
Sort by:

Thanks everyone for participating!

Alright, I've been thinking about how to resolve the market fairly. I loaded the very impressive image @deleuze has created in photoshop, to further understand what we are seeing.

Before auto leveling, what we can see is that the image varies between being completely black, to having a very small value in blue (RGB value of #000002). In my opinion, this should classify as noise given the extremely small variation that is not perceptible to humans.

After the image is leveled, the HUE for the leveled image varies between 60 and 61, which I think is also fair to consider as noise. The saturation does vary significantly. Given that the variation is not in the HUE, which is the "color" part of the HSB representation, I think that it's fair to classify the auto leveled image as monochrome, and the original image as virtually uniform. Therefore, I'm inclined to resolve the market as YES, but will leave it open to any concerns first.

@gpt4 The original image is covered in RGB (0, 0, 0), except for a thin strip where it's instead (0, 0, 2). There's almost no possible way for it to be better, other than to be absolutely perfect in every single pixel (hopefully we can agree this is too much to ask) or I guess the thin strip could be (0, 0, 1) but it would be silly to demand that. So it seems only fair to call it YES.

predicted YES

@gpt4 any updates?

bought Ṁ500 of YES

@gpt4 thoughts?

predicted YES

@deleuze I'll send you some mana if this resolves YES soon. I see you don't have much of a balance but you deserve a little more at least :)

@DylanSlagh +1 I will match it, interesting market and good discussion.

predicted YES

@deleuze take a close look at the top rows. They're whitish whereas the rest is yellow

predicted YES

@AltarraMq copy paste from comment below:

OP says: "Therefore, I think that a middle ground would be for the image to still look monochrome after auto-leveling it. I.e. we can ignore the fact that there is some variations due to noise, but not ignore shapes of different colors." I read it as saying: it will be alright if after leveling we have pixels of different values (lighter or darker), but they must all be of the same color (hue).

predicted NO

@DylanSlagh holy f*** that's subjective af. I mean, you can clearly see it's not monochrome with a naked eye. So it shouldn't be enough to resolve to yes.

@DylanSlagh Histogram of the bing-generated file.

predicted NO

@brp That's nice. OP doesn't say anything about histogram values though

predicted YES

@AltarraMq Nobody said this market wasn’t subjective. OP doesn’t have any shares so he can make whatever judgment he wants and based on his previous comments I think he will resolve it YES

@AltarraMq Seems pretty objective to me. Before leveling the image looks clearly monochrome. After leveling the value (brightness) is clearly not uniform (and doesn't need to be), the hue is almost absolutely uniform (it varies by the smallest possible amount). Just as required.

edit: no, actually I'm lying about the brightness, it's totally uniform. It's the saturation that varies. Luckily op only wanted the hue to be constant, and it is.

predicted YES
bought Ṁ25 of YES

@deleuze does someone want to explain why this doesn't cause an immediate yes resolution? or is the market just slow to respond?

bought Ṁ10 of NO

@DylanSlagh Well, it's not actually monochrome after being filtered. There's a fringe of different color. I don't like that requirement, but that's the requirement and I'll bet accordingly.

(Also - I can't figure out where did the watermark go. Can it be switched off somehow?)

bought Ṁ0 of NO

@GGtr interesting, I’ll be honest I looked at this just after waking up and I didn’t even see the pixels in the auto-leveling versions 😂

predicted YES

@GGtr auto-leveling will not make all pixels same if the difference is very small. It will actually make the difference bigger. Since the description says that pixels should not be all exactly the same, this should not matter.

I think meaning of "monochrome after auto-leveling" is not clear enough.

predicted YES

@GGtr bing sometimes doesn't add watermarks for some reason.

predicted NO

@deleuze Yes, naturally leveling will magnify small differences. The more uniform the image is, the more aggressively will leveling amplify them. OP says: "Therefore, I think that a middle ground would be for the image to still look monochrome after auto-leveling it. I.e. we can ignore the fact that there is some variations due to noise, but not ignore shapes of different colors." I read it as saying: it will be alright if after leveling we have pixels of different values (lighter or darker), but they must all be of the same color (hue). I think this is pretty unachievable and was not achieved here.

Yes, the requirement could have been formulated better.

@GGtr Thanks for better defining it.

The fringes of different colors around the border - is that an artifact of the auto leveling algorithm, or do they exist in the original image (I’m not next to a computer, so I can’t run photoshop right now to compare)

predicted YES

@gpt4 They exist in the original image.

@deleuze Thanks. This was definitely the most impressive attempt so far.