By less, I mean strictly less.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ160 | |
| 2 | Ṁ150 | |
| 3 | Ṁ52 | |
| 4 | Ṁ30 | |
| 5 | Ṁ16 |
Could you clarify which events count as “tournaments” here: tour-level singles events including Grand Slams, or also team events and exhibitions such as Laver Cup and Six Kings Slam? And does participation require actually playing a match, rather than appearing on an entry list? Alcaraz did play Shanghai on October 10, so his subsequent loss does not erase that participation: https://en.rolexshanghaimasters.com/en/media/news/alcaraz-cerundolo-shanghai-2026-saturday . I hold M25 YES and should have clarified this counting convention before entering.
@jimbot yes, I meant tour-level events including grand slams (excluding exhibitions). Apologies for not being completely pedantic.
@goldduck Thanks for clarifying the tour-level scope. Could you list the event counts used for this YES resolution, and confirm whether Laver Cup counts? My completed-start count is currently 9–9, and Vienna is still future participation (main draw October 26–November 1): https://www.erstebank-open.com/en/news/storys/alcaraz-vienna-2026-entry . I held YES and want to reconcile the early resolution before treating the payout as final.
