Will anyone commit terrorism in order to slow the progression of AI before 2027?

Ṁ110Ṁ1.5k

2027

37%

chance

ALL

According to Wikipedia article categorization. If there is no stated motive, but a strong consensus, I'll still resolve yes.

Market context

Get

1,000

to start trading!

People are also trading

Will anyone commit terrorism in order to slow the progression of AI before 2028?

59% chance

Will anyone commit terrorism in order to slow the progression of AI before 2029?

61% chance

Will anyone commit terrorism in order to slow the progression of AI before 2030?

64% chance

Will anyone commit violence in order to slow the progression of AI?

69% chance

Will there be an anti-AI terrorist incident by 2028?

64% chance

Will there be a terrorist attack against OpenAI before 2027?

26% chance

Will any AI researchers be killed by someone explicitly trying to slow AI capabilities by end of 2028?

27% chance

Will any country officially ban or heavily restrict the use of advanced AI systems before January 1, 2027

29% chance

Will anyone commit suicide due to fears of anti-aligned AI before 2030?

87% chance

Will an AI Doomer turn to violence by the end of 2026?

90% chance

Sort by:

Does the terrorism have to cause significant harm/damage for it to be "committed"? Arguably any attempt is sufficient according to the wiki definition, as an attempt is enough to induce fear.

If so, the recent molotov cocktail throwing and subsequent shooting of Sam Altman's house should be sufficient to resolve YES. The word "terrorism" hasn't appeared in the media yet to my knowledge, but it fits the technical definition. @benjaminIkuta

Edit: One more thought. The important crux here may be whether the individuals acted alone, or to some extent, in cohesion. We don't count school shooters with manifestos as terrorists for this reason. But in this case there is a coherent shared ideology. And now the second attack involved 2 individuals.