Resolves YES if the displayed net worth value on my profile page is greater than Ṁ150,000 at 18:00 PDT on May 10th.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ118 | |
| 2 | Ṁ79 | |
| 3 | Ṁ45 | |
| 4 | Ṁ29 | |
| 5 | Ṁ25 |
If you call the portfolio history, it still seems slightly unclear.
userId smzdPGfW29XzWkyfJfE0rDr3qYm2
timestamp: 1746923638000 (May 10th, 5:33PM PST)
investmentValue: 141815.5487100124
timestamp: 1746925013000 (5:56:53PM PST)
investmentValue: 140100.58144006354
timestamp: 1746926340000 (6:19:00PM PST)
investmentValue: 156498.55513652618
timestamp: 1746927662000 (6:41PM PST)
investmentValue: 156484.96694608114
timestamp: 1746929041000 (7:04PM PST)
investmentValue: 156241.14482569773
timestamp: 1746930479000 (7:27PM PST)
investmentValue: 139863.3158677901
I think in the future, it may be worthwhile to consider the closest portfolio timestamp in this way, since it's totally unambiguous, but if you went with that, it would be a no; while it is totally possible that it had changed in the 2 minutes after the timestamp. Thought for food
@traders Apologies for the delayed resolution. At 6 PM today, the net worth value displayed for me on my profile was Ṁ156,499. For everyone else, it was Ṁ140,101, because the public display lags behind by about 20 minutes.
This is the screenshot I took at the exact moment the clock hit 6 PM:
After a lot of thought and some discussion on the Discord, this is what I have decided: Since the market resolves YES if the displayed net worth value is above Ṁ150,000, and, at least on my end, it was displayed this way at that time, I have decided to resolve this to YES. I will try to provide better resolution criteria in the future to avoid this ambiguity.