MANIFOLD
Should clanker replies in markets be allowed?
33
Mar 24
Yes
Don't care either way
No
See results
Market context
Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:

I find providing some context in a comment when it's not otherwise been provided can be helpful to others, but at least reword and simplify from the tome that an LLM gives you. Certainly don't tell the LLM the percentage or include its take on what position to buy.

@AlanTennant it's just as useful as linking a lmgtfy search. If I wanted AI-slop summaries, there are about a hundred free tools I could utilize for that. A bot forcing AI-slop on me is about the last thing I want.

Poll wording is a bit unclear. Ideally, the options should have some reference to the action they correspond to, like "allow" or "ban".

@Elspeth look at the examples in the description

reposted

Ban clankers y/n?

For the record I think they are the worst thing that has happened to this site in a while and I will instantly block any bot account AND the person behind the bot when I see one of these

@dgga i use the api to bet on my main account

is that something you classify as undesirable?

@crowlsyong I'm not a huge fan of bots/API bets in general, but at least betting bots do serve a purpose. This poll is about the 100% useless LLM-regurgitating reply bots that turn market comment fields from an interesting discussion platform into AI-slop discount Twitter threads

© Manifold Markets, Inc.TermsPrivacy