1,000People are also trading
@YourHero I really dont care to buy this stock but I get fucked on my loans if the value drops. Could we just reverse the course? How about you start selling instead of buying and I'll do the same. Deal?
@dgga I'll sell up to 325 if you sell down to 275, then once you are out of YES you short it back down to 200 as it was before you jumped in
@YourHero umm that's not how it would work since I have double the stock you have but ok. You start.
@dgga So my end of the deal will be to sell up to 325 or higher. If it goes 72 hours without this stock hitting 325 or above, you can call me out on it and I will have 48 hours from the call out to fulfill my end. If I fail to do this, I'll pay 20,000 and the deal ends. Once I run out of shares in this stock, my end is completed and I won't interfere with your end until your side of the deal is completed.
Your end of the deal will be to sell down to 275 or lower and then short to 200. If it goes 72 hours without this stock hitting 275 or below, I will call you out and you will have 48 hours to fulfill your end. If you fail, you pay 20,000 and the deal ends.
Agreed?
@YourHero on principle I like that you want to make a deal, but it makes absolutely no sense for me to agree to these (or any) extra obligations when I could just buy the stock up to 500 and starve you out in 2 weeks while losing nothing;
I'm currently not overleveraged on my loans like you are. If I add value into this stock I gain more net worth which means I will eventually get back every penny I put into this stock. You do not have this option since you already receive no loans for any mana you put into this market.
I have double the balance and triple the net worth to engage in this trade war with you
I receive loans daily and have a portfolio outside of stonks, which means I have a daily income that dumpsters yours.
You should be grateful I'm ok with this 275-325 exchange for now.
No deal.
@YourHero play stupid games, win stupid prizes. Why on earth do you expect me to agree to your terms? Like, can you give me a single reason? There's no benefit whatsoever, and you expect to just lay down the terms without any leverage lmao
@dgga It's more of an assessment. If DGG people start using this site again and bet on these types of stocks, this stock will be buried into the ground again. Do you disagree with that?
@YourHero first of all I do. Q has not been a part of the community for over a year. No one cares, soon no one will even remember him.
Secondly, the hypothetical scenario you are crafting is not realistic, nor ever going to happen. Dgg community swarming this site was a byproduct of:
a) the sponsorship subs
b) market creator breakeven point at 5-10 traders (aka spamming ref links in chat earned you mana)
c) the referral bonuses from users signing up from said links made it lucrative to spam links
None of those features are here anymore and none of them are coming back. Dgg doesn't care, I know, I tried (I am one of the biggest user referrers on this entire site). Add on the fact that stonks are a dead legacy market type that manifold has developmentally completely abandoned years ago, and we get to the current situation. Stonks are 100% arbitrary and the richest person decides their value.
This is why I'm trying to get OUT of these markets instead of buying in more. Problem is I am the richest person who currently cares, so I have no intention of losing 100k+ while getting out – once I am out I wont give a single fuck about the value of this stock.
If you do care, I urge you to buy/sell this up as high as you can. I promise I will happily sell every penny I've invested here – at a profit.
@LukeM I actually like Q but this stock was artificially inflated even before the bridge burn. It should probably be around Sneako level.
@NGK This was the most obvious short in the world. Everyone who disagrees is coping themselves into Orbit