Antidepressants are safe to use (for 1-5 years)
4
100Ṁ65
2040
49%
chance

According to a new preprint: "A substantial discordance exists between the typical 8-week duration of clinical trials and the median 5-year real-world use of antidepressants"

Background

A recent preprint published on medRxiv highlights a significant discrepancy between how antidepressants are tested and how they're actually used:

  • Clinical trials for antidepressants typically last around 8 weeks (median duration)

  • In real-world practice, patients take these medications for a median of 5 years (approximately 260 weeks)

  • 88.5% of clinical trials last 12 weeks or less, with none extending beyond 52 weeks

The study also found that few clinical trials monitor for withdrawal symptoms (3.8%), include tapering protocols (18.9%), or report post-treatment outcomes (1.9%).


This raises the question of whether antidepressants are safe to use for the length they are prescribed and used.

Resolution Criteria

This market will resolve NO if by 2040 either:

  • there is significant scientific evidence (as judged by me or AI) that long-term use of anti-depressants (1-5 years) is unsafe, such that the median length of use appears detrimental

  • US national health organizations impose restrictions or publish recommendations against using or prescribing anti-depressants for lengths of 1-5 years

Resolves YES otherwise.

  • Update 2025-03-02 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Overprescription Threshold Clarification:

    • The market will resolve NO if evidence shows that 50% or more of individuals currently taking antidepressants are, in effect, overprescribed (i.e., should not be taking them).

    • This threshold is intended to capture a risk–benefit analysis where the actual benefit may not justify the level of prescription.

Note: This additional criterion complements the existing resolution criteria by providing a quantitative threshold for assessing safety based on overprescription.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Sort by:

Re: that second bullet point, people should know the current head of HHS thinks, without evidence, that anti-depressants don't work. It would not be surprising to see such guidance. https://abcnews.go.com/Health/rfk-jr-studying-threat-ssris-weight-loss-drugs/story?id=118937552

I don’t think guidance is likely to be published against long term use. Even if there were unforeseen health risks, the people who stay on them that long usually do it because they see benefit from it. In which case it would outweigh the risks

@GleamingRhino Hmm. I think selection effects are negligible, since median use is 5 years - but I take your point on the risk-benefit analysis. The 'spirit' of the question is whether it is actually worth it or not. Might need to do calculations but my rule of thumb would be resolving NO if it's +50% overprescribed (such that 50% or more of those that are currently taking it in the US in 2025 should not be taking it)

@barbarous This was just me speculating on why I didn’t think it was likely to resolve in a particular direction. I don’t see any need to adjust the market criteria

@GleamingRhino Fair, I do think I should differentiate between "has some negative effects" vs. "the negative effects are so bad (or positives are so little) it's not worth the risk"

Should the headline read "unsafe"?

@AdamBraff Good catch, I updated the description (YES and NO were swapped)

Bet YES if safe, NO if unsafe.

© Manifold Markets, Inc.Terms + Mana-only TermsPrivacyRules