![](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstorage.googleapis.com%2Fmantic-markets.appspot.com%2Fcontract-images%2FJakeAtlas%252Fc68060112467.jpg&w=3840&q=75)
Issues: (1) Whether the court should stay the Environmental Protection Agency’s federal emission reductions rule, the Good Neighbor Plan; and (2) whether the emissions controls imposed by the rule are reasonable regardless of the number of states subject to the rule.
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/ohio-v-environmental-protection-agency/
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ55 | |
2 | Ṁ16 | |
3 | Ṁ5 | |
4 | Ṁ2 |
@mods Resolves YES; they did rule in favor of the petitioners.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23a349_0813.pdf
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/ohio-v-environmental-protection-agency/
https://ballotpedia.org/Ohio_v._Environmental_Protection_Agency
@ajtalas Resolves; they did rule in favor of the petitioners.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23a349_0813.pdf
https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/ohio-v-environmental-protection-agency/
https://ballotpedia.org/Ohio_v._Environmental_Protection_Agency