b e n e v o l e n c e
also, resolves NO if the conditions are not met
(holding >=15k NO shares at the time of close)
Only human shareholders will count.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ1,069 | |
| 2 | Ṁ110 | |
| 3 | Ṁ66 | |
| 4 | Ṁ59 | |
| 5 | Ṁ52 |
People are also trading
Addressing your review, @Lion
False resolved.
That's incorrect. Someone holds >=15k NO shares at close and as such, the market should've and did resolve YES.
The market was clearly manipulated by an user and not according to community guidelines.
Market was indeed manipulated by a user, because this market is a game theoretic market about whether co-operation will occur. All markets are subject to manipulation.
There is no proof that the account is a human
We can actually check if the trades by any user are made via the API or manually. Kira made the trades manually. They also posted a picture of themselves with their username, and if they were not the person behind the username, I'd have expected the user to object.
Further, we can ensure that the devices used by Kira and Dylan are separate.
which was mandatory in the description of the question. This should've been resolved in N/A (or yes).
It was indeed resolved to "YES", so, there's no contradiction.
