Given there's essentially no volume here I'm inclined to just resolve this to 39% and call it a day?

. The paper I received didn't meet the quality I expected based on the reviews I had read. The writing felt generic, with little attention to detail, and required significant editing to be usable. Additionally, communication with the writer was slow, and I didn’t feel like my instructions were fully understood or followed.

Do bing search and advanced data analysis count here, or only third party stuff?

 Intention is to consider only ChatGPT on both numerator and denominator.

There are related questions I find interesting about whether GPTs are going to be successful that I'll link below:

 Yep, saw them on my search and decided those were not the questions I was most interested in, but definitely worth noting.

Resolves YES if, as best we can tell at the time, at least 10% of all ChatGPT queries use a GPT other than OpenAI's own DALL-E. 

If the answer is non-obvious and OpenAI isn't talking, I will use a poll or other best-guess methods to resolve, with effort proportional to participation.

#	Name	Total profit
1		Ṁ20
2		Ṁ6
3		Ṁ5
4		Ṁ1
5		Ṁ0

🏅 Top traders

People are also trading

People are also trading

Related questions