🏅 Top traders

@DesTiny boooo

@Conflux yeah a bunch of people changed their bet at the last second for profit, before that I think it was a 18-18 split. pretty close

@DesTiny yo wtf? someone would really do that? change their likes and position just for some mana????

@DesTiny Oh look, you colluding with your buddies again to profit! Exactly what’s going to make you worthy of a badge.

@NicoDelon lol

@NicoDelon 🗿

@Simon1551 💩

These markets almost always seem conceptually backwards because people (myself included) always flip these markets last minute for profit

@PatMyron yeah probably, I do think what it was like a few hours ago was a good representation of how people felt. Which was the whole point I made this market

@PatMyron I think that's a big difference with markets where people actually bet with real money

https://pastebin.com/V3nhwmik For anyone who cares enough to read 2 pages of my rambling

@DesTiny FeelsStrongMan Clap

@Simon1551

@DesTiny If you upload it as a twitlonger, you'll get +1 to drama, +3 sympathy.

@DesTiny farm those tears

Still convinced this market description was edited to profit:
https://manifold.markets/DesTiny/will-brazil-score-3-or-more-goals-a

@PatMyron Of course it was. The original sin.

@PatMyron Forgot that was DesTiny! Yeah, I think an apology for that should happen before they get a badge.

@PatMyron I will admit I do understand why someone might be confused by the fact the description was different from the others, but im swear on my life it was like that from the start. I even put it in caps to make it easier to notice.

@PatMyron FWIW I believe DesTiny in this particular case, even though my preference is for him not to get a checkmark because there should be high standards for checkmarks.

@StevenK Specifically, I remember it already saying "shootouts do count" when I made some of my trades, and it looks like all of my trades were before all of Pat's and Nico's trades. It was a surprising condition that was easy to overlook, and it's fair to criticize the market as misleading for not having a warning in the title, but I don't think it was edited for profit.

@StevenK I bet specifically at the end of open play because it was heading into a shootout, the description was edited more than once

@PatMyron I guess it's possible that he edited it to "shootouts don't count" or to [blank] after my bets, and then edited it to "shootouts do count" again after your bets?

Was never blank. Remember betting bc it specifically stated it and it wasn't ambiguous

@PatMyron I wonder if it's possible for admins to check.