This question results positively if Going Infinite contains a mention of the Centre of Effective Altruism at least two times (in at least two different sentences).
The mentions can be either in the foreword, introduction, or any other chapter – including footnotes. If only mentioned in sources it does not count.
🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ60 | |
| 2 | Ṁ34 | |
| 3 | Ṁ22 | |
| 4 | Ṁ20 | |
| 5 | Ṁ12 |
Question about the book: Is the title a reference to his willingness to play the st petersberg game or similar philosophical principles about EV-maximization? If so, does it acknowledge that money has diminishing returns on utility and so a st petersberg game cannot exist in the real world and a better rationalist wouldn't play like SBF and SBF's own community could have told him that?
It probably doesn't acknowledge that part. I don't know. It's possible the EA community actually lacks those sensitivities, and there is this split between the OG rationalists and EA.
I imagine he would have had that conversation with MacAskill at some point, and I know from reading MacAskill's takes on FDT that he's way below the rationalist community in analytic philosophy.