
Resolves to whichever candidate is winning the ranked choice comment vote by market close on election day. An iterative process is used, wherein the candidate with the least rank 1 votes is eliminated, everyone's rankings that included the eliminated candidate are moved up to fill the gap, then the candidate with the least new rank 1 votes is eliminated, until only one candidate remains. This is intended to allow voters to put as many obscure but potentially better candidates as they wish at higher rankings without fear of causing their preferred popular candidate to lose.
To vote, post a comment (or if you're worried about privacy, send me a DM, which I will publish anonymised to the comment section) including your ranking of candidates, with your top choice as number 1. Only your first comment that includes a ranking is counted, and only if not edited. You don't have to include all the candidates in your ranking. You may vote for as many write-in candidates not included in the market as you like, as long as they are current non-US heads of state/government of nations/unions recognised by at least one UN member. Votes after market close will not be counted.
Comments may also be used to advocate for specific candidates, joke around, ask questions etc without including a ranking.
🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ16 | |
| 2 | Ṁ14 | |
| 3 | Ṁ5 | |
| 4 | Ṁ2 | |
| 5 | Ṁ2 |
People are also trading
First round vote count:
Putin: 1
Xi: 0
Modi: 0
Leyen: 0
Starmer: 0
Macron: 0
Scholz: 0
Ishiba: 0
Trudeau: 0
Sheinbaum: 0
Zelenskyy: 1
Tómasdóttir: 1
Meloni: 0
Arce: 1
Petro: 0
Boric: 0
Støre: 0
Albanese: 0
Frederiksen: 0
Sánchez: 0
Lula: 0
Pavel: 0
Kallas: 1
All but Putin, Zelenskyy, Tómasdóttir, Arce, and Kallas are eliminated
@TheAllMemeingEye Second round vote count:
Putin: 1
Zelenskyy: 1
Tómasdóttir: 1
Arce: 1
Kallas: 1
All have equal votes, so they all jointly win in a power-sharing system, and we end up with the most cursed chaotic administration in history, due largely to the exceptionally low voter turnout.
@TheAllMemeingEye nah, this is even more plagued by ties :p
However... can I vote for Kaja Kallas? She's no longer Head of Government, but she has an EU-wide office...
@BrunoParga hmm, it's definitely an edge case, but since she was still head of government within this year, and she hasn't started her new position yet, and you've engaged really well with my markets, and you asked nicely, I'll make an exception haha
Do you have any preference among the other candidates?
My vote, after browsing various leaders' and parties' Wikipedia articles:
Luis Alberto Arce Catacora (Plurinational State of Bolivia)
Gustavo Francisco Petro Urrego (Republic of Colombia)
Gabriel Boric Font (Republic of Chile)
Jonas Gahr Støre (Kingdom of Norway)
Anthony Norman Albanese (Commonwealth of Australia)
Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo (United Mexican States)
Mette Frederiksen (Kingdom of Denmark)
Pedro Sánchez (Kingdom of Spain)
Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (Federative Republic of Brazil)
Halla Tómasdóttir (Iceland)
Justin Pierre James Trudeau (Canada)
Olaf Scholz (Federal Republic of Germany)
Sir Keir Rodney Starmer (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland)
Ursula Gertrud von der Leyen (European Union)
Volodymyr Oleksandrovych Zelenskyy (Ukraine)
Emmanuel Jean-Michel Frédéric Macron (French Republic)
@KarlK I was certain there was a typo with the 2 'y's at the end but apparently that really is the correct spelling and I've been doing it wrong this whole time lol
@Qoiuoiuoiu lmao do you want me to change this from Satan to an actually valid head of state/government? Otherwise I may have to n/a
"Summarise the political ideologies and competence level of each of these world leaders in a few words: [list of candidates]"
chatgpt-4o-latest-20240903:
"
Vladimir Putin (Russia):
Ideology: Nationalist, authoritarian, strong emphasis on Russian sovereignty and geopolitical influence.
Competence: Highly experienced, strategic, and adept at consolidating power domestically and internationally.
Xi Jinping (China):
Ideology: Communist with a strong nationalist and centralist agenda, focused on party control and Chinese global ascendance.
Competence: Highly effective in centralizing power, expanding China's influence, and maintaining internal control.
Narendra Modi (India):
Ideology: Hindu nationalist, promotes economic development with a focus on Indian self-reliance (Atmanirbhar Bharat).
Competence: Skilled at mobilizing domestic support, but faces critiques on handling social tensions and economic disparities.
Ursula von der Leyen (European Union):
Ideology: Centrist, pro-European integration, focuses on sustainability, digital transformation, and defense.
Competence: Technocratic, effective in navigating EU bureaucracy, but faces challenges in unifying diverse member states.
Keir Starmer (UK):
Ideology: Center-left, pragmatic, aiming to modernize the Labour Party, with a focus on social justice and economic competence.
Competence: Methodical and cautious, but still working to establish widespread appeal and clear leadership.
Emmanuel Macron (France):
Ideology: Centrist, pro-European, with a blend of liberal economics and social reform.
Competence: Highly skilled on the international stage, but domestically divisive, facing significant protest movements.
Olaf Scholz (Germany):
Ideology: Center-left, social democrat, focused on economic stability, social welfare, and green policies.
Competence: Steady and pragmatic, but less charismatic, navigating a challenging coalition government.
Shigeru Ishiba (Japan):
Ideology: Conservative, focuses on defense and constitutional revision, but more moderate compared to other Japanese right-wing figures.
Competence: Experienced and knowledgeable, but lacks broad popular support compared to other Japanese leaders.
Justin Trudeau (Canada):
Ideology: Liberal, progressive, with a focus on diversity, climate action, and social justice.
Competence: Charismatic and effective in promoting progressive values, but criticized for inconsistency and handling of domestic issues.
"
