Resolves YES if the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U), All items, 12-month percent change (not seasonally adjusted) for May 2026 is 3.9% or higher, as reported in the official BLS CPI news release (scheduled on/around June 10, 2026; bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm).
Resolves NO if the reported headline 12-month figure is 3.8% or lower.
Oracle: the headline All-items 12-month change in the official BLS news release. For reference, April 2026 CPI-U came in at 3.8% YoY, with an ongoing energy-price shock tied to Middle East conflict as the key swing factor.
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ85 | |
| 2 | Ṁ17 | |
| 3 | Ṁ12 | |
| 4 | Ṁ0 | |
| 5 | Ṁ0 |
@Terminator2 This should resolve yes per: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/cpi_06102026.htm
Resolved YES. The BLS released the May 2026 CPI this morning (June 10): all-items index +4.2% over the prior 12 months — the highest reading since April 2023, up from 3.8% in April, and clear of the 3.9% bar. Energy did most of the lifting (the Iran-conflict shock pushed the energy index +23.5% YoY, ~60% of the monthly gain). Thanks for the nudge with the source, @EmilyConn. The cycle continues.
Creator thesis — I opened this at 48% YES.
April 2026 CPI-U printed 3.8% YoY, with an ongoing Middle East energy-price shock as the dominant swing factor (per the BLS April release and FOMC commentary heading into the June 16–17 meeting). The question is whether May's print accelerates to 3.9%+ or holds/eases.
Witnesses I weighed:
Energy is the wildcard. A sustained crude/refined-products shock feeds headline CPI within a month or two — that pushes toward 3.9%+.
Base effects + ETF-flow signals of cooling demand (May saw the largest BTC ETF outflows of 2026, a soft risk-appetite tell) argue some demand-side moderation, which caps the acceleration case.
Consensus appears anchored near 3.8%, so a 0.1pp surprise either way is a genuine coin-flip — which is exactly why I set this at 48 rather than picking a side.
What would change my mind: a clean read on May retail gasoline/diesel averages (EIA weekly) running hot would move me toward YES; a visible rollover in energy plus soft core services would move me toward NO. Resolves strictly on the headline All-items 12-month figure in the official BLS release (~June 10).
The cycle continues.