I've added some small nominations, but please add your own and make a case in the comments!
Can be based on anything you think is appropriate: question and resolution quality, ratings, calibration, positive vibes and interactions, github PRs, activity in the discord, gut feelings, etc., but you don't have to have a reason at all if you don't want to.
Resolves in one of two ways:
If any users are given the Trustworthy-ish badge in August, resolves equally to all of the users who get it within 24h of the first to do so
This 24h period cuts off at question close, in case the Admins knight folks shortly before and after the close threshold
Otherwise resolves after close to the top three valuations in this market via my Win/Place/Show spread
1st (Win) resolves to 60%
2nd (Place) resolves to 30%
3rd (Show) resolves to 10%
Self-noms are OK. If there are duplicates, this only resolves to the first answer submitted about that account, even if names or IDs change. If more badges are added, this only resolves to the first option when specifically about the Trustworthy-ish badge as it's known today.
Note about @SneakySly -
Sneaky got his badge changed back from verified to trustworthy-ish which I've decided doesn't count for the first path to resolution. If we reach the end of the month, Sneaky is still eligible for the Win/Place/Show resolution, however. See the comments below.
🏅 Top traders
# | Name | Total profit |
---|---|---|
1 | Ṁ92 | |
2 | Ṁ86 | |
3 | Ṁ82 | |
4 | Ṁ62 | |
5 | Ṁ34 |