Skip to main content
MANIFOLD
[Survey] Should Manifold be a serious site?
10
Ṁ230Ṁ111
resolved Sep 1
Resolved
YES

I wrote a survey, about Manifolders, for Manifolders.

Resolves YES at the end of August more than 50% of survey takers answer that Yes, Manifold should be a serious site. Otherwise NO.

As I have all the info, I won't bet in this question.

Obviously the more people who take it, the better the results will be! Give it a go:

https://forms.gle/XeBEE2qr9Gbn86Ry7


If it jogs any inspiration in you, feel free to write questions of your own about it and comment them here! If you do, please use the group #Pat's Manifold Survey so they can be sorted together. And go bet on more in that group!

Market context
Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#TraderTotal profit
1Ṁ26
2Ṁ9
3Ṁ3
4Ṁ0
Sort by:

This seems like a false dichotomy. I'd prefer Manifold to be mostly serious with some humor on the side. I don't want the site to drown in rationalussy markets but occasionally a creative one adds value.

I think a Reddit-style approach has potential, dividing the site into multiple arenas with different focuses and levels of seriousness. Then people who don't care about e.g. destiny or rationalussy can easily avoid them.

@jcb you're not the first to say so! 😄 @Conflux

@jcb (but yeah, I personally agree most of the time)