A player that already has a Super Bowl victory is not eligible. A back-up on a Superbowl winning team is not eligible UNLESS they make a significant contribution to the game (not just kneels). "NO" will resolve when a QB officially announces files for retirement, If that is ambiguous, I reserve the right to make the final judgement, but will definitely hear arguments.
As more QBs enter the league (or make it up the ranks) I will add them!
I wonder what you mean by "significant contribution". Maybe rules can be changed to be whichever quarterback plays the most snaps for the game? Or the QBs that play at least 30% of snaps or something like that
@Riley12 I guess my test case would be like the Justin Fields sub package the Steelers ran. Or Mariota on sneaks for the Commanders. The objective measure is better I think (the other way to go would be include active backups but that significantly changes the market). It kinda sucks though if like a backup came in for a good drive and didn't reach the threshold there that they wouldn't be included? Maybe 30% snaps or 40+ yards total ground + air?
Daniel Jones being below zach wilson is a little crazy lol