Federal submissions = tax forms, federal grant applications, amicus curiae briefs, studies and statements submitted to Congress, etc
(Regulations only have to apply to one of those or something that counts as a "submission to the federal government" for the bet to resolve yes.)
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Name | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ30 | |
| 2 | Ṁ23 | |
| 3 | Ṁ16 | |
| 4 | Ṁ13 | |
| 5 | Ṁ6 |
People are also trading
Not sure how to rule on this. I see these stories, but they're both about internal use, not external submissions:
https://cointelegraph.com/news/us-space-force-bans-chat-gpt-ai-tools-security-concerns
https://www.theverge.com/2023/6/26/23774286/chatgpt-sam-altman-congress-house-ai-chatbots
@SilasBarta
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.575368/gov.uscourts.nysd.575368.32.1_1.pdf
and then
"Let Steven Schwartz show cause at the hearing of June 8, 2023 why he ought not be sanctioned pursuant to (1) Rule 11(b)(2) & (c), Fed. R. Civ. P., (2) 28 U.S.C. § 1927, and (3) the inherent power of the Court and referred to the Attorney Grievance Committee of the Appellate Division, First Department, and/or the Committee on Grievances of this District for aiding and causing (A) the citation of non-existent cases to the Court in the Affirmation in Opposition filed on March 1, 2023; (B) the submission to the Court of copies of non-existent judicial opinions annexed to the Affidavit filed on April 25, 2023; and (C) the use of a false and fraudulent notarization in the affidavit filed on April 25, 2023.1"
tl;dr a junior lawyer used ChatGPT to "find" relevant cases, failed to notice that they didn't exist, the client's lawyer also failed to notice, but the defendants' lawyer notice , and the prosecution now needs to explain themselves to the court.
@Imuli I'm familiar with the case. It was all over the news. It seems like the issue was more about submitting citations to fake cases than using ChatGPT per se.
Next time, just cut to the chase. No one wants to read 10,000 words without knowing the one relevant sentence you're linking it for.
@L I'd expect this by 2025 but I'm not sure about 2024, bureaucracy always has trouble with such things