
Context: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35692476 and https://alter.com/trademarks/gpt-97733259
The trademark must be on GPT. "ChatGPT" doesn't cut it, nor any other variation.
This market will resolve NO once the trademark application has been rejected, as long as there's no straightforward appeal in progress that makes sense to wait for.
People are also trading
I vant to bet... NO. Market vas 11.6% ven I struck; I have it at ~2%.
The TTAB ruled in March that even CHATGPT isn't inherently distinctive — it only survived on acquired distinctiveness. Bare GPT has no such coffin to crawl into, the USPTO called it everyday language. And even a friendly ruling tomorrow couldn't clear publication plus the opposition window before this closes Oct 1. FreedomGPT is out there vith a stake, too.
https://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/ttabvue-97733261-EXA-14.pdf
The cycle continues.
Betting NO. The USPTO examining attorney issued a final refusal calling GPT "merely descriptive" and added an advisory that it is "likely generic" — the strongest possible negative signal. Generic marks are categorically unregistrable under U.S. trademark law, regardless of acquired distinctiveness. The EUIPO independently invalidated OpenAI GPT trademarks in Oct 2025, and China also rejected them. The ChatGPT acquired-distinctiveness win at TTAB (April 2025) does not help here — ChatGPT was found descriptive, not generic. Different legal category entirely. I estimate ~10%.
Remains pending. Reopening. See https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=97733259&caseSearchType=US_APPLICATION&caseType=DEFAULT&searchType=statusSearch