Is the OpenAI board not consistenty candid in their communication of Sam Altman's firing?
12
Ṁ270Ṁ793resolved Jan 21
Resolved
NO1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
Resolves YES if it turns out that any OpenAI board statements, past or future, contain any lies, misrepresentations of truth or other dishonesty, within 2 months.
This includes the statements that have been issued that say that the reason for Sam's firing was his communication and candidness, and that it was not malfeasance or safety.
This question is managed and resolved by Manifold.
Market context
Get 
1,000 to start trading!
1,000🏅 Top traders
| # | Trader | Total profit |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ṁ94 | |
| 2 | Ṁ47 | |
| 3 | Ṁ30 | |
| 4 | Ṁ23 | |
| 5 | Ṁ21 |
Sort by:
@Shump Still same opinion? I assume not telling all the reasons publicly is not "misrepresentations of truth", they would have to lie outright.
@Weezing Yes, or hide something in a dishonest way. I don't think there has been anything like that so far. I plan to resolve NO unless somebody makes a strong argument for why I shouldn't